There are many System Implementation (SI) firms that can implement Workday in your organization. One of your options is Workday themselves who is often willing to accommodate similar commercial terms as some of the other large SI providers such as Accenture, Deloitte, IBM, etc. Below are the three most common pricing models most implementation partners offer as well as some key commercial asks that you should request from Workday if you choose them as your implementation partner.
Implementation Pricing Models and Resource Chart
In general, all major SIs offer a few different pricing models to choose from. Though Workday would be implementing its own system in this situation, you should still approach the RFP and negotiation process as you would with any other SI. Therefore, we recommend you ask Workday to provide you with the choice to choose from the following implementation pricing models:
A fixed-price model is a very common pricing arrangement and typically the easiest for organizations to manage. Before signing, both the client and the implementation partner agree upon a project outcome and an overall cost to achieve that outcome. Fixed-price contracts represent insurance that the deployment costs will not exceed the SI’s proposed cost.
However, a fixed-fee price often includes a contingency that may end up representing a significant part of the overall project cost. This contingency is usually a percentage added on top of an SI partner’s estimated cost for the project to protect the SI in the case that they require more time or resources than they projected. So, fixed-price contracts can be more costly than other options since you are paying a premium for the convenience and cost predictability that the model provides.
- Time and Materials (T&M)
A T&M model provides greater transparency into the overall cost of the project. With this model, you and your SI will agree on predetermined resource rates for time and materials and then only pay for the labor and resources actually spent on the project.
This model requires more managing than a fixed-price model and it may be subject to additional costs and change orders if the project is poorly managed. Change orders are likely to increase the number of hours for the SI’s resources and therefore, result in additional fees not included in the initial T&M estimate.
In this model, it is highly recommended that you request comprehensive cost transparency that comes with a “time and materials” estimate. We would expect Workday to provide a detailed view of the resources assigned to your project, the estimated number of hours per phase (if applicable) and finally, the total cost based on the resource rates.
- T&M with Not- to-Exceed
In a T&M with Not-to-Exceed (NTE) model, an SI would provide the same level of transparency associated with a T&M model in addition to a commitment that the total cost of the project would not exceed a specific amount, the NTE. This amount is usually the T&M plus a contingency percentage. Here, you get the benefits of a T&M agreement with the added protection of a cap on cost.
Regardless of which of the above pricing models you choose, you should absolutely ask Workday for a detailed resource loading chart that lists the cost estimate for the entire project. To provide you with greater cost transparency into the staffing model associated with your specific deployment, this should include Workday’s estimated level of effort in hours.
- Rate Card Transparency
As part of the resource loading chart, it is recommended you ask Workday to include a comprehensive rate card for the resources that they expect to leverage as part of your implementation project. Be sure to ask for Workday’s comprehensive rate cards that include both resources in- and out-of-scope of the project. It is highly recommended you request Workday provide full transparency on their rate card which would include the list, net, and associated discounts for all resources.
- Rate Protections
In addition to requesting rate card transparency, you should also ask Workday to lock the rates for a period of time along with putting caps on subsequent annual increases. This might be hard to achieve but it will provide you with cost predictability in the event that you need to deploy additional products after your initial project.
Change Order Protections
- Errors and Omissions
To protect your organization from costly change orders in the event that Workday’s assumptions about your project are incorrect or inaccurate, we recommend asking Workday up front to commit to allocating the resources necessary to meet the project timeline and delivery requirements at no additional charge to your organization (by not issuing a change order). Unless the inaccuracy is directly attributable to the performance or information provided by your own team, you should not have to incur the costs of a change order.
- Notice and Cure
While there is no sure-fire way to completely avoid change orders, being alerted to any issues that can lead to a change order in the near future will give you the opportunity to address the situation and potentially avoid that specific change order. Therefore, it is recommended you request that Workday provides your organization with advanced written notice of your failure to meet their obligations, so you have a chance to correct those performance issues prior to Workday issuing a change order.
If your organization is considering having Workday implement your Workday instance, asking for these key commercial asks will help you achieve better implementation cost transparency and price predictability in addition to potentially limiting the number of change orders that occur throughout the project.